| commit | 3fb08e79d4006c6fb9e85ea3d3244a580f5a5daf | [log] [tgz] |
|---|---|---|
| author | gwt.team.mmendez <gwt.team.mmendez@8db76d5a-ed1c-0410-87a9-c151d255dfc7> | Mon Mar 17 19:11:10 2008 +0000 |
| committer | gwt.team.mmendez <gwt.team.mmendez@8db76d5a-ed1c-0410-87a9-c151d255dfc7> | Mon Mar 17 19:11:10 2008 +0000 |
| tree | 5824b8b5874e3341f24e50a98f8d7f6e9b866acb | |
| parent | 6ef7147ef5dd71824bb21ff51b10848e938c6393 [diff] |
Fixes another problem with JSNI method signatures introduced in r2090. Decided to maintain information about whether a type bound was implicit (i.e. ?) or explicit ? (extends | super) T. Added a test case to JWildcardTypeTest to make sure that we don't break JSNI again. Review by: spoon (desk check) git-svn-id: https://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@2110 8db76d5a-ed1c-0410-87a9-c151d255dfc7