)]}'
{
  "commit": "51ea1c5db6408f3fa1d69f575691692467b17f97",
  "tree": "6cdfc416eb99bb9ea255ccb64af2fe869254eb09",
  "parents": [
    "0aa5a5e96e2c59b85c069394d0e03e7d4b532b24"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "gwt.team.scottb",
    "email": "gwt.team.scottb@8db76d5a-ed1c-0410-87a9-c151d255dfc7",
    "time": "Fri Aug 17 17:33:15 2007 +0000"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "gwt.team.scottb",
    "email": "gwt.team.scottb@8db76d5a-ed1c-0410-87a9-c151d255dfc7",
    "time": "Fri Aug 17 17:33:15 2007 +0000"
  },
  "message": "Fixes a bad assert.  I had thought that java.lang.Object would never end up needing a typeId, but I was wrong. In cases where an Object[] is instantiated, it does need a typeId.  Therefore, my original assertion that String would always have typeId \u003d 1 turns out to be wrong.  So I\u0027m forcing Object to always have typeId \u003d 1 and String typeId \u003d 2.\n\nReview by: mmendez (postmortem)\n\n\ngit-svn-id: https://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@1333 8db76d5a-ed1c-0410-87a9-c151d255dfc7\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "b997ff23fe853eba4fba3ea5a58101454c7ec7f4",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/CastNormalizer.java",
      "new_id": "e66a7186e003ef93ca0e80b4cea03395cdc3189d",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/CastNormalizer.java"
    }
  ]
}