commit c6e1aba57af265e503158742d3c11e42a33d5c42
author zundel@google.com <zundel@google.com@8db76d5a-ed1c-0410-87a9-c151d255dfc7> Wed Jun 08 23:12:42 2011 +0000
committer zundel@google.com <zundel@google.com@8db76d5a-ed1c-0410-87a9-c151d255dfc7> Wed Jun 08 23:12:42 2011 +0000
tree 50c87be16dd61a1a87409acc4db7158f34a4f7b6
parent f8cd477dd52875faf91f009206d0e1a886b8e7cd

I don't believe in magic, but as Scott points out, there are consistent
uses of the term to mean "compiler substitution of types", specifically
in java.lang.String and com.google.gwt.util.*.  I took a stab at replacing
the word "magic" in some other contexts where I think different terminology
makes the comments or names clearer.

A grey area is the com.google.gwt.core.GWT class.  Some of its methods are
re-written by the compiler, but in a way that is pretty clearly documented
and not as behind the scenes as the other uses.

Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1453804


git-svn-id: https://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@10303 8db76d5a-ed1c-0410-87a9-c151d255dfc7