)]}'
{
  "commit": "e3c057578a1b3318339cdbc26afd61be4c7617bf",
  "tree": "d5611f62e7d7d8185bbe473377836bff8824ed40",
  "parents": [
    "95e3bb88faaa7d603cc3d034bcce134c083890be"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "rjrjr@google.com",
    "email": "rjrjr@google.com@8db76d5a-ed1c-0410-87a9-c151d255dfc7",
    "time": "Fri Jan 21 01:38:25 2011 +0000"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "rjrjr@google.com",
    "email": "rjrjr@google.com@8db76d5a-ed1c-0410-87a9-c151d255dfc7",
    "time": "Fri Jan 21 01:38:25 2011 +0000"
  },
  "message": "Public(t.broyer@gmail.com):\n\nAdds a unit-test to explicitly check that redundant calls to\nshowActivityWidget are okay. The test is needed because\nAcceptsOneWidget passed to the Activity by ActivityManager is not\ndirectly the one you passed to its setDisplay() method, so\nActivityManager could (theoretically) evolve in the future and break\nthis use case, which isn\u0027t documented as being a \"valid use case\".\n\nAlso \"fixes\" what looks like an oversight in AsyncActivity#start.\n\nReview by rjrjr@google.com\nhttp://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/999802\n\nReview by: robertvawter@google.com\n\ngit-svn-id: https://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@9583 8db76d5a-ed1c-0410-87a9-c151d255dfc7\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "0f25f8b1506745874c87103104b29c6ac8dbee6a",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "user/test/com/google/gwt/activity/shared/ActivityManagerTest.java",
      "new_id": "46e2892387027cbc38b7d1197d3af52e06725869",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "user/test/com/google/gwt/activity/shared/ActivityManagerTest.java"
    }
  ]
}